china thinks i'm gay

January 21, 2010 17:25 by george

i don't get what it is with china and the internet. i suppose that when you have a billion people living in a traditional, suppressed country where censorship is required to perpetuate the government's control over its populace, you are bound to get some unexpected consequences.

case in point - starting a few weeks ago, traffic to my website tripled! this is really great news, because my revenue from Google AdSense has gone up from $0.12 per month to a staggering $0.45 per month (any time now, i'm planning on handing in my resignation from my day job)!!! i wanted to know why i should be the happy recipient of such mad fame! i mean, was it the fact that i posted like 15 posts in all of 2009, versus like 60 in 2008? maybe the scarcity of my posts was directly proportional to the number of visitors i received? i track my traffic with Google Analytics, so i went to it to figure out why my traffic levelled up so significantly.

china loves me!

it turns out that i get about 35 visits a day from china and they are all coming to my site for the same reason - "gay". that's right. the top keyword reference that leads to my website is "gay". all the "gay" on my website is currently accounting for over 80% of all the traffic to my website, overwhelming the previous main topics that drive traffic to my site, "canada's wonderland" and "adam hughes". and when i view all of the blog posts that i've created with the tag "gay" in them, there in an astronomical ONE post that i wrote about in 2007 about the gay pride parade. so seriously? that qualifies me as a global expert/authority of gay life? one post? it actually makes me feel kind of bad that i only have one article on "gay" rather than a whole bunch!

...because i've got gay!

all of these hits from all across china come from one site: baidu.com. baidu.com is like google for china (which is fitting, considering google and china are somewhat at war lately) and accordingly, the results that it serves are highly censored and according to the China Digital Times (via Wikipedia) "Baidu has a long history of being the most proactive and restrictive online censor in the search arena. Documents leaked in April 2009 from an employee in Baidu's internal monitoring and censorship department show a long list of blocked websites and censored topics on Baidu search". on the one hand, i'm pleased to not be on Baidu's blocked list, but on the other hand, it's a little disconcerting to know that the chinese government considers me to only have value as an inoffensive western homosexual.

i don't even know what to think of this. i've had a web presence since 1995, and while i'm definitely gay-friendly/positive, i'm also as assuredly not gay! there was a time in history not so long ago, where association with certain groups - in fact the mere suggestion that you were - would significantly fuck your life over. i think that the potential for a resurgence of that kind of associative hysteria is supremely low these days, but it's not outside of the realm of possibility, especially as china ascends to a pre-eminent role in the global economy… and more intimately, since i have to go to china for a good friend's wedding!

so what posture does one assume, being armed with this knowledge and warned by these lessons from the past? well, i suppose my response is to be proud that my positive attitude is being broadcast to an inquisitive new audience. my response is to be vocal about the importance of the exchange of ideas and encouragement of tolerance and love towards others. my response is to say that i'm okay with china believing that i'm gay, because it doesn't matter to me what strangers think, and moreover, i don't date asians (my own form of internal bigotry that i'm content to suffer insults over). and finally, my response is to double the number of blog posts that i have tagged with the tag "gay"!

i hope you enjoyed this post, china. i'm sure this isn't what you came to my site to read. i now fully expect my traffic to dwindle back to its original trickle since baidu.com will almost certainly blacklist me once it indexes this!

- g

song of the day for discovering your identity is being subverted: people are people, depeche mode.


why i don't date bartenders/waitresses

January 2, 2010 15:35 by george

don't drink and dateif you have ever found yourself suddenly and unexpectedly at the end of a relationship, extinguishing your last hopes for a meaningful relationship in a city of insulated souls, then you may have learned as i have that the best way to recover your pride and self-worth is to go to a trendy bar and repeatedly drink yourself into a coma.  but not just any coma, errr, i mean not just any bar.  in western canada, there is an old and well-established tradition of staffing upscale bars exclusively with bartenders and cocktail waitresses who are all really really ridiculously good-looking.  the right bar is essential because the wrong bar can induce bitterness and negativity, making it impossible to pull out of a shame-spiral-ego-nosedive.   the right one can be stimulating, encouraging and flattering in ways that can help you feel better and keep you from thinking of yourself as decaying infectious human waste.

that having been said, there are certain rules of engagement around becoming a valued patron of such an establishment.  no dancing on the bar.  no stripping of clothes beyond your underwear.  no criminal assault of fellow patrons.  following these simple guidelines can help raise your status from miserable, annoying barfly, upwards to the point of favoured patron and big-fish-in-tiny-bowl.  however, becoming friendly and familiar to your hot bartenders will run you the risk of becoming interested in them romantically, and that can lead to certain disaster.  here, for your consideration, are my five top reasons for creating my dating rule "no bartenders or waitresses", no matter how good an idea that it might seem.

1) they work for tips:  this is the most obvious point.  although there are alarmingly few locations in toronto where this fact is recognized, it pays for serving staff to be kind and complimentary to patrons because if they develop a rapport, it might lead to a larger tip than if the patron utterly despises them (unless he or she is into that S&M dom-sub kind of thing).  at times when one's self-esteem is low, it is possible to hyperbolize this kindness and openness and turn it into a kind of freudian projection of affection.  put another way, it's possible for your imagination (and the alcohol you consume) to play tricks on you as you ponder the possibility that this kindness and concern might extend beyond your fourth or fifth martini.  however in cold mathematical terms, at $12 a pop, an additional martini is really only exciting because it represents a $1.50 increase in the evening's take-home from tips (or $3.00 if you have had more than three martinis).  now, this arrangement typically works out reasonably well for all interested parties, and has since sometime in the middle ages.  but statistically speaking, if a bartender has to be nice to 50 - 100 people in an evening, the chances that you-the-patron are truly special are considerably lower than if you found a complete stranger being nice to you, without the encouragement of a gratuity.  this point obviously doesn't exclude from the realm of possibility that you have a genuinely interested server… i'm just saying that it's less likely.

2) they are being hit on constantly:  just think of the term… "hit" on.  if i came up to you and hit you in the shoulder once, you'd probably be pretty perturbed.  if a thousand people came up and punched you in the shoulder, you'd either lose your arm or your mind.  the point is, it's numbing.  it builds a proactive flinching response, or even a protective layer… like calluses… that makes it difficult to the point of annoying to successfully pierce through that defence.  some people like that kind of challenge, and that's fine as ways of being go.  i for one, pity the staff who have to sit and bear with it because hospitality is their industry.  put another way, if i came up to you and asked you to drive me to edmonton from toronto, you might consider it for several seconds before shutting me down.  you might weigh the benefits of touring the most beautiful country on the planet Earth with the cost and inconvenience of a four day drive.  but if a hundred people per night asked you the same question, you would quickly negate any internal evaluation and respond with a pat answer that is quick, convenient and decisive, no matter who the travelling companion was.

3) they work with alcohol and alcoholics:  it's a lifestyle.  up until late at night and sleeping all day.  people are constantly trying to buy them a shot or a drink to lower their inhibitions and ply them against point #2 above.  it's a vicious cycle.  a bartender doesn't want to seem stand-offish, but they need to pace themselves (and typically, their management doesn't want to encourage a proliferation of drunken servers).  so very often and understandably, alcohol becomes elaborately interwoven into a bartender's daily routine in a way that might be discomforting to the normal day-time person.  i can say from experience that the life has its own gravitational pull from which it is difficult to escape.  for example, it's pretty difficult to get up for an early gym appointment or run if you've ben out until 5am partying at after hour spots.  i think that may be the actual genesis of the vampire legend.  some poor girl in the 1300's was obsessed with some hot bartender, and decided that it was a supernatural state of being to party like a rock star all night and sleep all day -  a stereotype still very much live and in effect in the 21st century.  however, the vampiric way of life is not highly conducive to success in the world of the living.  

4) poisoning the well: once in a very blue moon (like the one we are having this very week), there will be several interesting bartenders - any one of which would be a fantastic candidate for an actual relationship.  the problem is knowing how to choose the right one.  if you pick one and pursue her, you run the risk of incurring the resentment of the rest.  say Bartender 1 has a mild interest in you.  Bartender 2 is the solid best choice, but Bartender 3 is mind-blowingly sexy.  (now, isn't this so much like the logic problem in the classic "lady or the tiger" conundrum that philosophers have wrestled with forever?)  choosing any one will definitely impact any subsequent opportunities with any of the remaining set - like trying to take a picture of an electron, observing the system necessarily alters it.  pick the interested one, and you demonstrate your lack of sincerity to the solid choice.  pick the solid one, and the one who is interested hates you for not recognizing her interest.  take a shot at the hot one, and you could be shot down in flames, emasculated, with nowhere to turn because you are so shallow as to go with the choice that every mass-media-programmed-drone would prefer.  the only ethical choice is not to choose any of these options since they could all lead to harm, but to look elsewhere.

5) who could love a loser:  ok - i don't care how charming you are… no one can be happy to see someone at a bar 6 nights a week.  there are only two possible reasons anyone could befriend someone trying so hard to hit rock bottom.  it may be possible that (1) that person is so naturally charming and personable that in spite of a regular diet of 4 to 9 vodka martinis a night, repeatedly forgetting what he or she was saying, doing, or how he or she gets home night after night, he or she really is a super-cool person that everyone loves to have around.  i find it more likely that (2) that person is seen as a positive force for economic stimulus, and so long as he or she is not embarrassing customers or staff, his or her astronomical bar tab is more than welcome.  any reasonable person would prefer not to think of their bartenders and waitresses seeing him or her as the latter case #2, but this is a very real possibility.  and if that's the case, you should definitely not want to date them. even if it's the former case #1, you would like to think that they would do or say something to stop you from spinning out of control. 

this post has been something of a farce, but it is a bit of a window into why i have established the rules that i have over the years.  if i were some 20-year old who thought about these things in one sitting, you might be right to be sceptical or concerned.  but having long ago been a young guy, gazing longingly upwards at inaccessible bartenders and waitresses, and then becoming the guy who had to sit next to the douchebag-loser-guy trying to pick up my bartender/waitress girlfriend, to finally becoming the guy who was trying to pick-up some douchebag-loser's bartender/waitress girlfriend, i can tell you that this concise 5-point checklist is based on years of experience.

everyone is adrift in a sea of chaos.  some of us are good and some are less good.  everyone wants love, and almost everyone is deserving of it.  if you are attracted to someone or think them to be grand, there should be no harm in letting them know.  if you are not, keep it to your own damn self.  if someone is nice to you, be thankful, and don't get all caught up in it.  bartenders and waitresses are fantastic people who are exceptionally socially experienced and mature and it's only natural to be attracted to them. just let them do their jobs without turning it into a shakespearian tragedy.  trust me.  you will regret it when you hear about it at your friend's new years eve party!

- g

song of the day for knowing how some things are going to end: People Got A Lot Of Nerve, Neko Case

ps.  happy new year!  welcome 2010!


to netbook or to not-book

October 7, 2009 16:39 by george

gateway ec ulv

this weekend, i almost impulse-bought myself a netbook.  as a professional who uses computers constantly for work and play, a netbook seems a great compromise between capability and convenience.  much of my job is creating documents like proposals and design documents - work that doesn't demand a lot in the way of memory or computing power, and often, i wish that i could just pick up and work from anywhere at any time.  i have a fantastic laptop that i use as my principal work machine, but at 7 pounds, it's just a tad on the heavy and large side to toss into my daypack and take on my bicycle or for a longer walk.  i have an equally fantastic smartphone on which i certainly COULD write and edit large documents, but its little screen/keyboard are just a little too awkward for extended sessions.

i was at future shop on sunday browsing the various models with their various assortments of capacities and capabilities.  on the cheap side of the spectrum are extremely basic models with 1GB of RAM and minimal features, but they're cheaper than the cost of my iPhone.  what they offer is a fairly effectively-sized keyboard which would make slamming out words effortless compared to my phone, and at just two pounds, they are way more portable than my laptop. on the high end, and this was REALLY mouth-watering, 3GB of RAM and a luxurious 250GB hard drive, the device almost seems to whisper promises of the ability to run development tools and graphics software, which would really seal the deal.  even at $500, it seems to offer a very viable option for a transportable device that i could use at a starbucks or on the subway or my bedroom when i need to escape my cats' relentless attacks while i work.

i was all set to pull out the credit card and run off with this puny powerhouse when i thought about what the hell i was doing.  i have an ultraportable, ultralight, ultrasophisticated smartphone on which i can do almost everything that i can do on a netbook.  i have an ultrapowerful, ultrasexy mac book pro that has been my faithful and fashionable workhorse for a year and half that shows no signs of becoming outdated or outclassed by any device that i've seen since i got it.  all i would be buying for my $500 would be a middle-class device that would make all the features of my smartphone redundant, and would frustrate me for its limitations when it came time to do some actual work. 

so i decided to not purchase a netbook and sealed that open question until i had a better reason  to get one.  what i decided instead was that if i really needed a quick and portable way of capturing my thoughts, i would resort to the time-tested and true method of writing in a (paper) notebook.  my moleskine notebook never runs out of battery power, and it's good in low and high light conditions.  it's surface offers nearly limitless levels of stylus-pressure-sensitivity.  it's good for text and graphics alike.  while it's storage is limited, and has no search capability to speak of, it is cheap to extend and never makes me wait while it processes some background request.

i'm not saying that this is the only answer to the question of "to netbook or to not-book", but i'm pretty glad that i didn't give into an artificially-created consumeristic
trigger to buy something that i really didn't need.  i think that i might finally be showing a sign or two of maturity!

- g

 


ok - i'm back

September 27, 2009 09:07 by george

alright.  sorry about that everyone.  it's been a few... er... months.  but now that i've got things under a little better control in my life and work these days, i think that i have some time to get caught up on the blogging again.  i have a huge back-log of things to write about - almost none of which are relevant anymore.  accordingly, i might just write new stuff and leave the lost-time of the spring and summer to the mysteries of time.  who knows.  

ok - now that i've got the site running again, i've got to head out and do some errands.  see you in four or five months.  

kidding

- g


Tags:
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

where in the world is george pechtol?

May 14, 2009 18:18 by george

sorry to all of you who have come to believe that i have abandoned my umbilical-like connection to the interwebs. i know that i have been neglecting my blogging commitments, and for that i apologize. hopefully, you have all come to love google reader like i have, allowing it to let you know when the objects of your affection have both the time and inclination to share their thoughts and musings with you.

before i left for my vacation in april, i had to cram in as much development effort as i could to get things ready for my absence. while i was on vacation, i made a conscious effort to enjoy my time off and rejected any notion of obligation to inform you all of what i was experiencing, thinking that it would make great reading after-the-fact. since i have returned, i have been cramming all of my duties into the all-too-tiny 24-hour time frame with which all of us mere mortals are forced to contend. as my current project approaches code-completeness, i can see the light at the end of the tunnel and an opportunity to report on the past month's experiences. i already have reams and reams of stuff to share with you - like chocolate-flavoured beer, why life is better closer to an oceanic body of water, and extremely-recent emotional disturbance. since we have a long weekend coming upon us here in canada, i will try and get out a post per day (or so!) to get you caught up on where i am nowadays.

special gratitude goes out to everyone gracious enough to make my last trip out west the most enjoyable experience of my young life. you know who you are because i slept on your couches or your spare rooms and drank your chocolate-flavoured porter! i love you (chocolate-flavoured porter)!!!

- g

song of the day for needing more time: time, sarah mclachlan.